United Earth: Rules

Suggested to replace the United Nations Charter

by Paul VanRaden

July 4, 2024

Updated July 4, 2026

 

Topics

We, the people

Rules

Governance and limits on power

Transition from UN to UE

History

Predicted order of joining

Declaration of Dependence

 

We, the people of earth, unite to govern ourselves fairly, preserve our freedom, increase our liberty, promote peace, avoid war, and improve our lives. We depend on each other to respect some rules when we exchange goods, communicate, travel, and live our lives within or across our national borders. Our nations are no longer independent. New tools, ideas, goods, diseases, and cures can quickly reach all nations. More effective international government could help us and our nations to maintain and expand markets, sustain global transportation, resolve international disputes, and defend each other from threats to democracy. To achieve these goals, we join in a United Earth.

Since 1945 when the United Nations began, local and regional wars have not expanded into world wars and nuclear bombs have not destroyed any cities. The United Nations has helped to avoid world wars by formally discussing international issues but has allowed many nations to fail internally. More people now live in fear of their own government than of being invaded by another, and many people now live as refugees outside of nations that did not or could not support the needs of life. A major goal of United Earth is to rebuild failed states into prosperous nations, thus preserving or promoting the human rights of all people, as people and their governments did in the years after 1945. United Earth reserves the right to help people anywhere, especially if and when their own nation ignores their rights and needs.

The United Nations was not designed to be a government and could not enforce its resolutions due to lack of any military budget, little ability to tax, a weak Charter very difficult to amend, and the power of 5 nations to veto any decision. In contrast, United Earth is designed to govern. The rules are more like a global corporation whose member nations can invest in improving the world and share in the benefits.

We adopt the following rules for United Earth to protect our rights, defend our liberties, and improve the lives of all people in all nations.

Rules

1.  United Earth’s member nations may elect or appoint 1 member to each committee if their estimated population is > 1/1000 of earth’s current population. Currently those members could include 101 nations with populations above 8 million. Nations that join may later secede, but any United Earth property in or from that nation will remain controlled by United Earth. Voluntary secession should be rare and peaceful, like the British exit from the European Union.

2.  The Democracy Rating Committee will choose a scale and rate how well each nation’s government complies with principles of democracy, international law, and human rights. A simple majority vote of the committee will approve each nation’s rating each year, or when major changes to democratic rule occur during a year, or before new members join. The chair will only vote to break a tie.

3.  Nations that democratically unite and then vote as 1 nation will inherit the votes of the previous N members; if a member nation democratically splits into N members, each will inherit 1 / N of a vote in the Democracy Rating Committee. The committee will also certify estimates of each nation’s population.

4.  In all other committees, nations with higher democracy ratings will get proportionally more votes. The vote of each nation will be weighted by its democracy rating multiplied by its current estimated population. A rating of 0 will exclude a totally undemocratic nation from membership in United Earth until its rating exceeds 0. Excluding outlaw governments from voting will protect the democratic rights of governments that respect law and voters.

5.  Member nations that elect instead of appoint their committee members may be assigned higher democracy ratings by that committee.

6.  The governing committee will set taxing and spending policies, hire and fire the heads of major executive departments, and establish a court system to resolve disputes.

7.  Current functions of the United Nations can be transferred into United Earth to maintain current services while developing further global services with better funding, more effective management, and more democratic control.

8.  United Earth may assess and accept taxes in local, national currencies but may also issue and convert those taxes or entire national currencies into its own new currency (Earthos), like the conversion of former European currencies into Euros in 2000. Nations may pay all taxes in currency (national or Earthos) or may prefer to pay in kind by transferring ownership and control of ports, military bases, and military hardware (ships, planes, tanks, nuclear missiles, etc.) to United Earth for its long-term operations. The finance committee should propose transfers and prices to obtain such national resources.

9.  The United Earth military will defend international waters and lands previously defended only by volunteer nations or by treaties. The United Nations began with a similar goal that was never developed due to poor governance, lack of funding, and lack of trust. National alliances and bilateral defense treaties are useful, but more direct control of international defense by a majority of earth’s people will better deter aggression. Few nations will declare war on the whole world.

10.                Direct military action inside failed nations will be United Earth’s responsibility even if that nation’s failed leader objects. The Democracy Rating Committee may rate a state as failed and recommend that the Governing Committee commit resources to restore order and make life livable for people in that nation.

11.                United Earth will have full authority to govern the whole earth when national governments representing a majority of earth’s people adopt these rules. Any nation may join and its voting power will reflect its democracy rating and current population. If a majority of earth’s people have not joined by 2039, a new set of rules to replace these will be offered for adoption.

Governance and limits on power

Goals of United Earth are to help people become and remain free and to guarantee their rights. Limiting the power of a world government is even more important than limiting national governments by checks and balances. If a dictator takes control of a nation, outside forces can remove the dictator from power such as with Hitler in 1944, but no outside forces will be available if a dictator takes the world government.

A world army directly funded by world taxes could enforce world decisions but also might too easily take rights away from people if generals stopped following orders from UE leaders and took control themselves. Instead, UE could lead armies controlled and funded by their nations as the UN Charter had imagined but has not used. That design is used by NATO and was used by previous missions such as the 1950 Korean War. The 1991 Gulf War was authorized by the UN where 42 nations sent help to free Kuwait.

Local funding of armed forces is more like the US National Guard and more consistent with the policy that UE members can cancel their membership. NATO members can leave the alliance 1 year after deciding too, but since 1949 no nations have left after joining. UN members should continue to enforce the rules they already agreed upon such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights even after joining UE.

Democracies, corporations, and many organizations must prevent their chief executives from stealing power or money for their own use. Executives who break laws can be arrested and fined or put in jail. Arrest is very difficult if the chief executive controls the treasury, the justice system, the army, appoints a court that says he can break any law with no penalty, and has half the legislature willing to believe all his lies and ignore all his fraud, no matter how obvious. Even in small organizations, the board of directors appoints a treasurer and hires an auditor whose job is to find and prevent fraud. Otherwise, some elected leaders become rich by taking power and money away from their citizens and taking bribes from anyone, like the US president can now do.

In large global companies, boards of directors are responsible for directly selecting, hiring, overseeing, and removing all officers of the corporation including the CFO (Chief Financial Officer), COO (Chief Operating Officer), CTO (Chief Technology Officer), and other functional heads, not only the CEO (Chief Executive Officer). About half of U.S. based companies follow Delaware General Corporation Law which gives a CEO much less power than a US president has. Further rules (bylaws) to distribute and limit powers of individual executives will be needed to make UE government more honest than US government.

In the EU, the legislative branch (European Parliament) is directly elected every 5 years within the same 4-day window across all member nations. The executive branch (European Commission) has a President elected by the Parliament by secret ballot. Then, 26 Commissioners (one per member state) are nominated by the President and each is approved separately by the Parliament. Those rules are like for cabinet heads in the US nominated by the President and approved by the Senate, except that cabinet secretaries do not need to each be from different states. For other EU executive agencies such as the European Central Bank, the Court of Justice, and Court of Auditors, member nation governments appoint the judges and auditors, or a Governing Council elects the ECB President, with final approval by the European Parliament.

In the UN, senior officers such as Secretary General, High Commissioner for Human Rights, UNICEF Executive Director, and other agency heads are nominated by members, voted on by the Security Council, or vetoed by the 5 permanent members, and their final choice then gets approval from the General Assembly. The Secretary General office has a 5-year term and rotates by continent. The last 3 were each reelected with no opposing candidate, but the office has a 2-term limit, and a new Secretary General will be elected in 2026.

The UE could appoint a nominating committee instead of a security council to locate or screen candidates followed by the general weighted voting procedure used for all other actions. In early rounds, members could still add other candidates or vote for candidates that the nominating committee had not listed. Ranked choice voting can speed the election process.

Direct elections of UE officers do not seem practical or desirable due to language, culture, and political system differences across countries and cost of campaigning worldwide. Few leaders have their names recognized by the voters across earth except sports heroes, movie stars, or other entertainers who might win but perhaps not govern as well. Past political leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, or Barack Obama might have been able to win a global election, but the world should not trust any one person to govern all people well. A team of separately chosen officers could better govern the earth than one person dictating what every agency and every nation should do.

Transition from UN to UE

Most modern governments have 3 main branches – a legislative branch to make the rules, an executive branch to follow and enforce the rules, and a judicial branch to interpret the rules for individual cases of conflict. The UN is not a government because it does not have an executive branch to enforce its rules; the governments of its member nations must do that instead. The UN does not have a legislative branch and does not make laws, it makes resolutions. That is clear just by reading the highlighted goals in Article 1 of its charter.

Article 1: The Purposes of the United Nations are:

1.  To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;

2.  To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace;

3.  To achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion; and

4.  To be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends.

The other 110 Articles also use language making clear that members can volunteer to enforce UN decisions but that the UN itself has no resources to enforce its resolutions.

Article 43: All Members of the United Nations, in order to contribute to the maintenance of international peace and security, undertake to make available to the Security Council, on its call and in accordance with a special agreement or agreements, armed forces, assistance, and facilities, including rights of passage, necessary for the purpose of maintaining international peace and security.

Because the UN was designed to be weak, the Charter reserved the right of individual or groups of nations to unite in other treaties or governments such as the EU or AU or NATO to solve the problems that the UN is unable to solve:

Article 52: Nothing in the present Charter precludes the existence of regional arrangements or agencies for dealing with such matters relating to the maintenance of international peace and security as are appropriate for regional action provided that such arrangements or agencies and their activities are consistent with the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations.

The UN Charter has not been amended in >50 years, but its text makes clear that starting from scratch with new agreements is always permitted. The Charter says that if the UN is not meeting its purposes, we can meet those goals using any other arrangements, such as by uniting the earth with a real international government.

Article 95: Nothing in the present Charter shall prevent Members of the United Nations from entrusting the solution of their differences to other tribunals by virtue of agreements already in existence or which may be concluded in the future. [Regarding the International Court of Justice]

History

In 1944, Wendell Willkie “argued for a fully democratic structure for the United Nations—one that would give smaller nations equal power and open a clear path to freedom for colonized countries.” Instead, U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt wanted to give the nations who won World War II permanent control of the UN. Thus, the UN Charter did not lead to a democratic world.

In 1948, a World Constitution was proposed by a team led by the University of Chicago:

Preliminary Draft of a World Constitution.

From 1950-1991, a World Constitutional Convention and later assemblies drafted and revised a

Constitution for the Federation of Earth. A Provisional_World_Parliament still meets occasionally to try to keep that idea alive.

         In 2024, Paul VanRaden suggested the above rules to replace the UN Charter because the UN is not a government, not very democratic, and provides almost as little power as the US Articles of Confederation or the League of Nations which were replaced and discontinued many decades ago. Fewer rules that are more democratic will allow member nations to solve bigger problems by combining their resources to benefit the whole earth.

 

Predicted order of joining

Ideally, the United States and the United Kingdom would be first to join United Earth 250 years after they became independent and began a global trend toward separation. But neither nation favors the goal of world democracy because their governments would lose some power. Rich people do not like to be taxed by poorer people, but American and British tax rates might actually decrease if costs of policing the world were paid for by world taxes instead of US and UK taxes. The UN’s 5 permanent members of the Security Council (US, UK, France, Russia, and China) are the 5 countries least likely to join because their governments currently are immune from any UN control. Dictators also are less likely to join because then they may need to explain why their nation’s democracy rating is so low.

Countries most likely to sign first are those that believe in democracy and deserve more power in world decisions. India has the most to gain in United Earth compared to UN. Like all other countries, India has only 1 of the 193 votes in the UN General Assembly (0.5%) but will have 36% of the votes in United Earth due to its large population and good democracy rating. Other nations will also gain votes such as Indonesia with 7%, Brazil with 5%, and Japan with 4%, along with several nations of Europe. More of Earth’s voters will control United Earth policy. The 5 countries that currently can veto any UN decision will still have 25% of the total votes, but the majority can make decisions without their approval.

These new rules will give us a fairer voice and a better path toward governing our nations and the earth. We, the people, should join this United Earth.

 

Declaration of Dependence

         When people decide to govern their earth jointly instead of each nation and state governing separately, we should declare what caused us to unite our laws and to depend on each other. We need to convince others that all human lives can improve when we have a chance to work together instead of each nation governing alone. No nation has a right to govern other nations or other people without their consent.

         All people agree with the folowing truths, that peace, security, laws, cooperation, and friends are better than war, danger, anarchy, violence, and enemies. We need local, regional, national, and global governments to make and enforce rules, protect us from harm, and preserve peace, but allow each of us the liberty to pursue happiness by thinking, speaking, moving, and acting on our own beliefs and choices. Before governing us, each government should get consent from all people it governs.

         Americans declared in 1776 why they chose independence and explained how poorly the colonies had been governed, but 250 years later they elected a President who governs them now like the king did then. “The history of the present King of England is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations… He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states… obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners… He has obstructed the administration of justice… He has made judges dependent on his will alone… cutting off our trade with all parts of the world… transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offences… He has excited domestic insurrections among us…” The United States began earth’s trend toward democracy, but Americans now may need to depend on the rest of the world to help preserve democracy.

         Declaring independence and declaring war often happen at the same time, whereas declaring dependence often leads to peace, such as nations of Europe creating a European Union. They wrote their rules so carefully that when the United Kingdom declared their independence from the EU, neither side declared war, and most British voters now want to redeclare their dependence on EU. Americans did not write their rules as carefully, and when southern states declared their independence from northern states, both sides fought a very bloody war, and the states fighting for independence lost.

         People now buy half of their goods from people living in other nations who ship their goods to us across national borders or oceans. Earth has 7 continents and thousands of islands but 70% of earth is ocean. All nations agreed to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, but the UN has no navy to enforce any of those laws. All nations share the same air, but the UN cannot stop any of us from poisoning, polluting, or heating the air by adding elements such as carbon or chemicals such as freon to it. Any nation or private company may now launch rockets into space, but the UN cannot stop any nation or company from making space less usable by filling it with orbiting junk that may damage useful satellites.

         People of all nations can become friends. We should consent to give a new government real power to govern the air that we breathe in, live under, and fly thru, the oceans that our goods arrive on, our ancestors arrived on, and that touch each shore, the space above the air that earth travels thru, and the land that supports all of us land lovers. Global government could let each of us improve and live our lives where we choose, like the EU does. Our free and independent nations can unite, like 13 American colonies united and then gradually became 50 united states, and like 27 nations in Europe gradually became a European union. Our lives will improve when we retire the United Nations, we join the United Earth and make this whole planet better and people freer for the next several centuries.

[This is not The Loyalist Declaration of Dependence of 1776 when some Americans pledged allegiance to the  king.]

 

Back to:

Defending National and Creating World Democracy